SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 179

CHAKRABARTI, MALLICK
NEW INDIA TANNIS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AURORA SINGH MOJBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JITENDRA MOHAN SEN GUPTA, JNAN CHANDRA ROY, NALINI KANTA MUKHARJI, PHANINDRA KUMAR SANYAL

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-company carries on the business of making extracts of myrobalan and exporting the same to foreign, countries. It has a factory called 'rong Kuti' where its manufacturing business is carried on. Early in 1953, the chimney needed re-pairs and by a letter written on the 18th of March, the appellant-company engaged one Hazara Singh to dismantle the upper portion of the chimney and hoist a new length of chimney instead. In pursuance of that contract, the work was taken up by Hazara Singh through his men and while the work was being carried on, one Bishan Singh who, among others, was engaged in it, fell from a height of sixty feet and met with an instantaneous death.

( 2 ) ON the basis of the death of his son by the accident of the fall, respondent No. 1, Aurora Singh Mojbi, made an application for compensation against the appellant und-r the Workmen's Compensation Act. He alleged that Bishan Singh had been employed by the appellant and while so employed, had received personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment which had resulted in his death. The appellant-company by its written state rent disc aimed liability.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top