SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 177

LAHIRI, SEN GUPTA
BHABANI PROSAD SAHA – Appellant
Versus
SARAT SUNDARI CHOUDHURANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.GUPTA, APURBADHAN MUKHERJI, JNANENDRA KUMAR ROY, Tarak Nath Roy

LAHIRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for a declaration that the properties described in the plaint are the self-acquired properties of one Manindra Nath Chowdhury and that the defendant had only a Hindu widow's right of enjoyment for life in respect thereof and a further declaration that the plaintiff is the reversioner in respect of the said properties and that he being the reversioner in respect of the properties the defendant is bound and liable to invest in Government securities the money that would be fixed by the Government on account of the award in respect thereof.

( 2 ) THE facts which are undisputed are these. One Dharanidhar Saha Chowdhury had a daughter named Jyotiriswari and the plaintiff Bhabani Prosad Saha is the son of Jyotiriswari. Before his death Dharanidhar adopted Manindranath Chowdhury as his son. The defendant Saratsundari is the widow of that son. Manindranath died some time in the year 1914 leaving Saratsundari as his sole heir. Before his death several properties were purchased in the name of Suratsundari. Subsequently the properties which stood in the name of Saratsundari were notified for acquisition by the Government for exten








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top