SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 47

J.P.MITRA, S.K.SEN
S. DUTTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, Anil Kumar Bose, J.M.BANERJEE

J. P. MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants, S. Dutta and Bhupati Naha, were tried by a learned Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta. They were both convicted under Section 420, read with Section 120b of the Indian Penal Code as also under Section 27 of the Drugs Act, 1940. Appellant S. Dutta was also convicted under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. In respect of the offence under Section 420 read with Section 120b of the Indian Penal Code, appellant Bhupali Naha was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 8 months. He was also sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 8 months in respect of his conviction under Section 27 of the Drugs Act. The two sentences imposed upon him were, however, ordered to run concurrently. The other appellant Section Dutta was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3 months in respect of each of the three convictions, but the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

( 2 ) APPELLANT Naha was, at all material times, the proprietor of Messrs. Chandemerdaya and Co. , while appellant Dutta, who is a nephew of Naha, was the proprietor of Messrs. Bhabani Medical Stores. Dutta was also a salesman of Chandemardaya and Co. The said charges were the outcome of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top