SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 16

P.N.MUKHERJEE, RENUPADA MUKHERJEE
BENOY KUMAR MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
PANCHANON MAJUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BINOYENDRA DEB RAI MAHASAI, NIRMAL KRISHNA CHATTERJI, RABINDRA NATH BHATTACHARYA

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the grant of letters of administration to the respondent Panchanon Majumdar alias Panchanon Mondal in respect of the estate of one Sm. Sarojini Mazumdar, deceased.

( 2 ) IT has been found by the Court below that the deceased Sarojini was a Christian by religion. That finding is not challenged before us by either party. Respondent Panchanon who was the applicant for the letters of administration was related to Sarojini in the manner as will appear from the following genealogy;

Respondent taken along with the fact that Sahadeb and Rajkumar were two brothers; or, to put it more succinctly and in a direct form, the relevant genealogy under which the respondent Panchanon claims would stand as follows;

Respondent

( 3 ) APPELLANT Benoy, who was the objector to Panchanon's claim for letters of administration, also pleaded that he was related to Sarojini through his remote ancestor Raghu who was the brother of Bharat, the paternal grandfather of Sarojini's grandmother (mother's mother) Bilashini, and, upon that allegation, he claimed under the following genealogy:

Appelent.

( 4 ) BOTH parties agree that Panchanon's claim to the let







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top