SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 131

P.B.MUKHARJI
RAKHALDAS PRAMANICK – Appellant
Versus
SHANTILATA GHOSE – Respondent


P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is the plaintiff's application for an order granting leave to him to pay the filing fees in respect of (1) exhibits, (2) depositions and (3) minutes of the proceedings had before the special Referee and that upon payment of filing fees the said exhibits, depositions and minutes be treated as properly filed with retrospective effect from the date when they should have been filed along with the first report of the Referee dated 4-5-1949.

( 2 ) THERE is little substantial objection to the order. As the parties made the documents exhibits, as the depositions were before the special Referee and as the minutes of the proceedings are the official records o. f what took place before the special Referee, bare justice demands that they should be allowed to be read as part of the proceedings in this matter. It will be an outright denial of justice now to say that exhibits actually tendered and made exhibits by both the parties should not be treated as exhibits and not read as evidence or that the depositions taken before the Special Referee and relied upon by both the parties should not be read as depositions or that the minutes of the Special Referee recording











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top