SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 103

SINHA
ANNADA PRASANNA MAJUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
T. C. SETH, COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amiya Kumar Mookerji, BINAYAK NATH BANERJEE, NIHAR RANJAN MAJUMDAR

SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE facts in this case are shortly as follows: The petitioner is the owner of a Taxi Cab No. WET-1099 and holds a permit No. P. Co. P. 1871 in respect of the same. He employed a driver of the name of Md. Ibrahim, The Central Preventive Circle, Land Customs, Calcutta, received information that contraband betel nuts would be transported by Taxi Cab No. 1099 from Bongaon to Calcutta via the Jessore Road. Officers of the Central 'preventive Circle, Land Customs, kept watch at Gate No. 2 of the Habra Railway Level Crossing. On 30-12-1954 at about 2 A. M. in the night, they found a taxi coining from the direction of Bongaon, They closed the Railway gate when the taxi was near the gate, and although the driver made an attempt, to turn round, the taxi was apprehended. It was found to bear the registered number WBT-1099 and upon check, 7 bags of betel-nut were found inside the taxi. Apart from the driver named Ibrahim, there were two persons Sarkar and Haldar, who claimed the goods but could not produce any document to show their right to the goods. A written-statement was taken and these two persons said that they had purchased the betel nuts at Bongaon Railbazar but that





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top