SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 51

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
SEN GUPTA
S. K. SRIVASTAVA - Appellant
Versus
GAJANAND PATRIWALLA - Respondent
Criminal Revn.  124  Of  1956
Decided On : MARCH 06, 1956

Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, Amiya Kumar Mookerji, ASOKE SEN, G.P.KAR, NONI COOMAR CHAKRAVARTI, PRASUN CHANDRA GHOSH

The Magistrate issuing a search warrant under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, has jurisdiction to pass orders regarding the disposal of the goods and documents seized by executing the search warrant.

Headnote:

SEARCH WARRANT - SEIZURE OF DOCUMENTS - JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE - DISPOSAL OF SEIZED DOCUMENTS - SEA CUSTOMS ACT, 1878, SECTIONS 172, 179 - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1898, SECTIONS 96, 98, 99, 101, 517 TO 523 - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, ARTICLE 20 (3).

Fact of the Case:

The Assistant Collector of Customs, Calcutta, obtained two search warrants under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, 1878, for the search and seizure of dutiable, prohibited, restricted, and smuggled goods and documents relating thereto from the premises of Messrs. Palriwalla Brothers Ltd. and other premises at No. 14 Netaji Subhas Road, Calcutta. During the search, over 600 files, registers, and other papers were seized, but no prohibited goods were found. The opposite party, Gajanand Palriwalla, filed a petition for the immediate return of the seized documents and copies of the application by the Assistant Collector of Customs, the search warrants, and the search lists. The Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, initially rejected the prayer for the return of the documents but later ordered their return on the execution of a bond for Rs. 10,000/-.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the Magistrate issuing a search warrant under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, has jurisdiction to pass orders regarding the disposal of the goods and documents seized by executing the search warrant. The Magistrate must retain ultimate responsibility for and control over the search warrant issued by him and must see that it is executed in the same manner as a search warrant issued under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. The requirement of producing the goods and papers seized before the issuing Magistrate must also attach to a search warrant issued under Section 172, Sea Customs Act.

Issues: 1. Whether the Magistrate issuing a search warrant under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, has jurisdiction to pass orders regarding the disposal of the goods and documents seized by executing the search warrant? 2. Whether the Magistrate's order directing the return of all the books and documents seized on execution of a bond can be allowed to stand?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Magistrate has a discretion under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, to issue a search warrant on an application by a Customs Collector stating his belief. The Magistrate must retain ultimate responsibility for and control over the search warrant issued by him and must see that it is executed in the same manner as a search warrant issued under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. 2. The requirement of producing the goods and papers seized before the issuing Magistrate must also attach to a search warrant issued under Section 172, Sea Customs Act. The Magistrate must allow the Customs authorities sufficient opportunity to scrutinise the books and papers, but ultimately the disposal of the books and papers must be under the Magistrate's order.

Final Decision: The High Court set aside the order of the Chief Presidency Magistrate directing the return of the books and papers on execution of a bond for Rs. 10,000/- and remitted the matter to him to be dealt with in light of the observations made by the Court.

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application by the Assistant Collector of Customs, Calcutta, is directed against an order of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, dated 24-1-1956, for the return of the document seized in execution of two search warrants under Section 172, sea Customs Act, 1878, to the opposite party Gajanand Patriwalla on his executing bond for Rs. 10,000/ -.

( 2 ) THE facts are briefly as follows: On 8-11-1955, the Assistant Collector of Customs made an application before the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, for the issue of a search warrant with respect to premises No. 14, Netaji Subhas Road, Calcutta, under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, stating in the application that he believed that dutiable, prohibited, restricted and smuggled goods and documents relating thereto were secreted in the premises, and a search warrant was issued on the same day for search ana seizure of illicitly imported goods and documents relating thereto. On 9-11-1955, on another application a second search warrant was issued for search and seizure of goods and documents relating to illicit import as well as to illicit export. On the strength of the two search warrants the premises of Messrs. Palriwalla Brothers Ltd. and other premises at No. 14 Netaji Subhas Road, Calcutta, were searched during the 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th and 14th November, 1955, and over 600 files, registers and other papers were seized along With rubber stamps, but no prohibited goods were found or seized. On 17-11-1955, the opposite party Gajanand Palriwalla made an application before the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, for the immediate return of the documents seized and also for copies of the application by the Assistant Collector of. Customs, Calcutta, the search warrants and the search lists. The learned Chief Presidency Magistrate passed an order for giving the copies out rejected the prayer for return of the documents at that stage and ordered detaining of the same till 28-11-1955. On 28-11-1955, the opposite party filed another petition for return of the documents. But after hearing the lawyer for the petitioner the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate granted time till 28-12-1955, to complete examination of the papers. On 28-12-1955, the opposite party renewed his prayer for return of the documents, while on behalf of the Customs Department a petition was filed stating that the examination of all the papers would take a long time, that some papers which did not appear to be incriminating had already been returned to the opposite party and that as the papers had been seized in execution of

search warrants under Section 172, Sea Customs Act it was not necessary to produce the documents before the Court, and that after scrutiny of the books and documents and disposal of adjudication proceedings by the Customs Collector the papers and goods would be disposed of according to the provisions of the Sea Customs Act. The learned Magistrate, however, granted time till 24-1-1956, to complete the examination of the papers. On 24-1-1956, the opposite party renewed his prayer for return of the seized books and papers. On behalf of the Customs Department another petition was filed stating that the examination of the books and papers was not complete and repeating the contention that the books and papers were not required to be produced before the learned Magistrate but were to be disposed of by the Customs Department. The learned Magistrate thereupon observed that the books and papers had been seized under search warrants issued by him and he could not, therefore, surrender his jurisdiction. He then passed the order complained against, namely, that the books and papers be returned to the opposite party Gajanand Palriwalla on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/ -.

( 3 ) MR. Kar appearing for the Assistant Collector of Customs has urged that when goods and documents are seized in execution of a search warrant issued under Section 172, Sea Customs Act, they ar









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top