SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 82

GUHA RAY
TARAPADA MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
HAJIA KHATUM BIBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN PRAKASH CHATTERJI, PURNA CHANDRA BASU, RISHINDRA NATH SARKAR, SUDHANSU K.HAZRA

GUHA RAY, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal by the defendants arises from a suit by respondent 1 Hajia Khatun Bibi for a declaration of her title to the land in suit to the extent of 8 annas share and for joint possession thereof along with defendants 1, 2 and 3.

( 2 ) THE facts as far as they are admitted or beyond dispute are briefly that the disputed land belonged originally to Abdur Rahaman, father of the plaintiff Hajia Khatun. Abdul Kasem was a brother-in-law of Abdur Rahaman. On 13-6-1933 Abdul Kasem and Abdur Rahaman executed an Instalment mortgage bond, of which a certified copy is Ex. 2, in favour of Surendra Nath Mandal, defendant 2. Abdur Rahaman died on 19-3-1936, corresponding to the 5th Chaitra, 1342 B. S. , leav ing a widow and two minor daughters, viz. , the plaintiff and pro forma defendant 3 Rajia Khatun. Abdul Kasem died in 1343 B. S. It is the plaintiff's case that after Abdul Kasem's death when defendant 2 pressed the plaintiff's mother for payment of his dues on the mortgage there was an adjustment in the presence of the villagers to the effect that defendant 2 would be placed in possession of the land mentioned in schedules Ka and Kha and he would be in possessi











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top