SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 65

DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE, J.P.MITTER
ADHI MALLICK – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KISHORE MUKHARJI, Nirmal Chandra Sen, S.S.MUKHERJEE

DEBABRATA MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner Adhi Mallick was charged on three counts -- first with having committed an offence under Section 419, secondly with having committed an offence under Section 420 and thirdly with having committed an offence under Section 465, Penal Code.

( 2 ) THE facts upon which the three counts of charges were attempted to be sustained were briefly these:

( 3 ) THE petitioner put himself forward as owner of a certain plot of land which in fact he was not. As a result of this false representation the complainant was induced to part with a sum of money (Rs. 2500/-) and a deed of sale was said to have been executed by the petitioner in favour of the complainant's son. The document was registered in due course. A considerable time afterwards it was discovered that the petitioner had nothing to do with the land in question and that he had perpetrated fraud upon the complainant. A complaint was made which ultimately led to the petitioner being tried upon the three counts of charges indicated above.

( 4 ) TO these three charges the petitioner pleaded not guilty and his defence appears to be that he had not executed the document in question.

( 5 ) AT the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top