CHAKRABARTI, LAHIRI, SINHA
ABANINDRA KUMAR MAITY – Appellant
Versus
A. K. MAJUMDAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE are thirty Rules, taken out by the same or different owners of different plots of lands, so long cultivated by Bargadars under, them and are directed against orders passed by the Appellate Officer, in appeals by the Bargadars whereby orders passed by the Board, directing restoration of possession of the lands concerned to the petitioners were set aside. The principal ground on which the orders are challenged is that the West Bengal Bargadars Act, 1950, is ultra vires, being violative of Articles 19 (l) (f), 19 (l) (g) and 31 (2), Constitution of India. The Rules were issued by one of us, but when they came up for final hearing, it appeared to him that it would be more advantageous, to have the important questions involved in the cases decided by a larger Bench. There were two reasons why that course appeared to be preferable. One was that the question of the alleged invalidity of the Act was one of fundamental importance and the same question was involved in a large number of cases actually pending and would, in all probability, arise in a larger number of cases which would come up in future. The other reason was that there had already been a decisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.