SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 194

R.P.MOOKERJEE, SARMA SARKAR
BAHADUR SINGH CHHETRI – Appellant
Versus
BIR BAHADUR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KUMUD BONDHU BAGCHI, MUKTI MAITRA, RAJENDRA BHUSHAN BAKSHI, Satya Priya Ghosh

MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendants' appeal out of a suit brought for a declaration that a certain kobala which had been executed by one Bir Bahadur Singh 'alias' Kalika Singh Chhetri was a void one as the alleged vendor was a person of unsound mind and did not fully comprehend the effects of the acts done by him. The suit had a chequered career.

( 2 ) THE mother of the alleged lunatic had filed a suit making herself and her son plaintiffs. She had applied for leave to sue as a pauper. She was allowed to do so. No formal leave was at the initial stage taken for the proper representation of the alleged lunatic. Such defects were cured when the suit came up for hearing before the final stage. The suit had been dismissed at one stage as no proper steps were taken. An application for rehearing was subsequently filed and the suit was revived. This is how the suit had been pending from the end of 1947 till the end of 1949 when the trial came to an end in the Lower Court. The declaration, as prayed for, has been made. The defendants, one of whom was the transferee under the conveyance, have both appealed.

( 3 ) THE principal questions for consideration in this case are whether Kal















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top