SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 205

DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
B. N. MEHROTRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DUTTA, DILIP KUAMR DUTTA, J.C.SINHA

DEBABRATA MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued to show cause why certain proceedings pending against these petitioners under Section 6 (c) read with Section 23, Indian Boilers Act should not be quashed or why such other or further orders should not be made as to this Court might seem fit and proper.

( 2 ) THE proceedings are pending in the Court of a Magistrate, First Class, Barrackpore, against these four petitioners who are the directors of Messrs. Bharat Woollen Mills Ltd. , Mill No. 2 at 4, Nillganj Road, Belgharia, 24 Parganas.

( 3 ) IT appears that on 22-3-1954 the Chief Inspector of Boilers, West Bengal, wrote a letter of complaint asking for prosecution of the directors of Messrs. Bharat Woollen Mills Ltd. , a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act. The letter alleged that as a result of inspection of Mill No. 2 at 4, Nillganj Road on 24-12-1953 it was discovered that a particular boiler located In the mill was actually steaming without a certificate having been taken out for it authorising the use of the boiler. In these circumstances a prayer was made that a prosecution might be started against the petitioners for infringement of the provi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top