SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 29

P.B.MUKHARJI
MURLI TAHILRAM – Appellant
Versus
T. ASOOMAL AND CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, M.N.SEN

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a race between the State and the private citizen for Law's rewards. It is an application by the State of West Bengal claiming priority over a private creditor in respect of certain funds in the hands of a Receiver and by specific order" of Court ear-marked for payment to the creditor who is the decree-holder.

( 2 ) THE State is a stranger to the suit. The suit was brought by Murli Tahilram against the firm of T. Assomal and Co. On 10-9-1953 a decree was passed in this suit against the defendant for the sum of Rs. 2860-2-4 with interest at six per cent, per annum and costs. Prior to that date, on 4-8-1953 an order had been made in that suit appointing the Official Receiver of Calcutta the Receiver of the business of the defendant firm including all the goods, stock-in-trade, furniture and fittings at A 7/10, New Market, Calcutta. In execution of the decree a further order was made on 19-1-1954 in this suit directing the Official Receiver to sell the said goods, stocks and furniture. The Receiver was directed by that order to pay to the plaintiff decree-holder out of the sale proceeds in satisfaction of the decree. It is material to set out the term






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top