SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 23

LAHIRI
SUDHIR CHANDRA JANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, Ajoy Kumar Basu

LAHIRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Rule against the order of the Sessions Judge, Midnapore, dated 14-8-1954, by which he has ordered a further enquiry by a First Class Magistrate be made into the case under Section 395, I. P. C.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are as follows. One Urmila Dassi lodged a First Information Report at the police station alleging that the petitioners, along' with several others, trespassed into the house of the complainant's husband, Ramanath, and demanded a sum of Rs. 500/- from Ramanath alleging that the petitioners were entitled to this amount as the costs of a litigation between Ramanath and the petitioners. Upon Ramanath's refusal to comply with the request, Ramanath was dragged and was assaulted with fists and slaps. "on hearing the alarm raised by Ramanath, the informant Urmila came out of her house and saw the beating. The informant was also dragged outside by two of the petitioners, named, Sudhir and Ramesh Sudhir, assaulted her with a lathi, causing injuries on her person, while the other petitioner, Ramesh, snatched away her gold earring from her left ear, which resulted in the lobe of that ear being torn asunder. It was further alleged t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top