SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 34

DAS GUPTA, GUHA RAY
SUSHAMA ROY – Appellant
Versus
ATUL KRISHNA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHABANATH DUTT, BISWANATH NASKAR, S.HAZRA

DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal raises the difficult question whether in a case where the shebaits of a deity have precluded themselves by their conduct from bringing a suit to protect the interests of the deity, a person interested in the proper sheba puja of the deity may institute a suit on behalf of the deity even though not appointed as next friend of the deity by the Court.

( 2 ) A private debottar was created by Bhaga-bati Dassi for the deity Sree Sree Iswar Jugal Kishore. Jiu by a deed of dedication. By the died the lady constituted herself the first shebait and provided that after her death Bejoy Lal Roy would be the shebait; and on Bejoy's death, his eldest son would be the shebait and in this way the eldest of each successive shebait would become shebait. After the death of Bejoy disputes arose between his sons, Atul Krishna and Monmatha, over the claim, to shebaiti and Monmatha instituted a suit against Atul Krishna claiming joint shebaitship with Amalya and for framing a scheme in accordance with the principles laid down in the case of -- 'pramatha Nath v. Pradhyumna Kumar', AIR 1925 PC 139 (A) by the Privy Council. An order was passed for representation of the deity










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top