SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 4

SINHA
KSHIRODE CHANDRA PAL – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, HOWRAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA, Arun Kumar Dutt, D.N.Basu

SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a resident of Pansila, P. S. Shyampur in the district of Howrah. He was a holder of firearm license No. 1167 in respect of a 12 bore DBBL gun No. 5383. This gun was sold by him to Sri Panchanan Adhikary, another license holder in the town of Tamluk on 15-1-1953. On 16-1-1953, he appears to have informed the District Magistrate of this fact and forwarded a copy of the letter to the Officer-in-charge of Shyampore Police station. On 26-1-1953, he received a notice or a communication from the Sub-Inspector of Police, Shyampore Police station, set out in para 5 of the petition. It appears from this document, which is described as a notice that it is recorded that the fire-arm license of the petitioner had been seized, having been cancelled under the Howrah District Magistrate's office Memo No. 1697-C dated the 24-12-1952 and S. P. /d. I. B. office Memo No. 3 (2)/34-48 (2) 419 dated 30-12-1952. On 2-2-1953, the petitioner wrote a letter to the District Magistrate, Howrah, complaining of this so-called notice. The grievance was that in the notice no reasons had been recorded in writing as to why the license had been cancelled. It was further stated that












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top