SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 46

SINHA
BISAKHA RANI GHOSE – Appellant
Versus
SATISH CHANDRA ROY SINGHA – Respondent


SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE facts in this case are shortly as follows:

( 2 ) THE petitioner had a permit for plying a state carriage between Berhampore and Khagra Bazar, Murshidabad in 1950. That route was found unremunerative. In the same year she was also granted a temporary permit for the route between Ghantala Ghat and Radha Ghat which was also found unremunerative. In June, 1952, a temporary permit was granted to the petitioner in the Berhampore Jalangi route and it was an express term of the grant that the petitioner should also run her bus in the town service which was unremunerative. In May, 1953, the R. T. A. , Murshidabad invited applications for one permanent permit on the Berhampore Kharimpore route via Jalangi. The petitioner made an application and the respondent No. 14 also made an application and there were other applicants. A Sub-committee was appointed to go into the matter and it appears that a report was made. That report is not before me, nor has it been disclosed to the petitioner. On 15-2-1954, the Regional Transport Authority, Murshidabad resolved that the permanent route should be granted to the respondent No. 14, Sri Meghendra Narayan Singha. So far as the order





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top