SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 40

CHAKRABARTI, LAHIRI
ATINDRA NATH MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
G. F. GILLOT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KUMAR DAS GUPTA, H.N.RAI CHOUDHURY, S.K.ROY CHAUDHARY

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE appellant before us has lost a fairly good job just for a pair of shoes. He was employed in the Metal and Steel Factory, Ishapore, in the capacity of a Godown-Keeper of the Senior Grade. It has been found against him departmentally that while so employed, he on 28-8-1951, ordered a labourer of the factory to make a pair of leather sandals for his personal use and that he also supplied the labourer with the requisite quantity of material from the Government stores. If the appellant's transgression had stopped at that point, I do not know whether his employers would have taken as serious view of it as they have done, but they have also found that the appellant caused the issue of the material to be shown against a contract which had, in fact, been executed long ago, Upon-the above findings the appellant has been removed from his office, but he complains that his removal has not been in accordance with law.

( 2 ) IT will be convenient now to state the 'facts in somewhat fuller detail. The Metal and Steel Factory at Shapiro is one of the Indian Ordnance Factories under the control of the Ministry of Defence, Gvernment of India. The post-held by the appel






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top