SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 48

LAHIRI, CHAKRABARTI
MD. SARAFATULLA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
SURJA KUMAR MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BISWANATH BAJPAI, HEMENDRA KUMAR DAS, Nirmal Chandra Sen, RABINDRA NARAYAN CHAKRAWORTY

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal raises a short but important point. Having considered the matter and having heard the learned Advocates, I find myself, with great respect, unable to subscribe to the view taken by the learned trial Judge.

( 2 ) THE appellant is a resident of village Maharajpur, situated within the jurisdiction of the Doulatabad Union Board. At the elections to the Union Board of that Union held on 22-2-1953, the appellant offered himself as a candidate and was elected. At the same time, eight other candidates also succeeded in the election. At the relevant time, the appellant was holding the post of Union Agricultural Assistant of the Paharpur Union, which, it would seem, is a post under the Director of Agricultural, Government of West Bengal. It is admitted by all parties that be was a whole-time Government servant

( 3 ) AFTER the results of the election had been published, Respondent 1, who was another successful candidate, moved this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for a Rule on the appellant to show cause why his election should not be set aside. The ground on which that application proceeded was that the appellant was a Government servant an













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top