SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 190

DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
BACHURAM KAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KISHORE MUKHARJI, N.C.Sen, S.S.MUKHERJEE

DEBABRATA MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE three petitioners in this case were convicted under Section 188, Penal Code and sentenced each to pay a fine of Rs. 25/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month.

( 2 ) THE disobedience charged related to an order under Section 144, Criminal P. C. which had been made on 24-8-1954 by Sri B. N. Poddar, a Magistrate of the First Class, Uluberia. In the absence of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sri Poddar was in charge that day of his file and in that capacity made the ex parte order requiring the petitioners not to enter the disputed land or disturb the possession of one Annada Prosad Dalui and others, who were the first party, to the proceedings. The dispute related to possession of a portion of plot No. 2844 of khatian No. 299 in mouza Kankrole. The order was served on the petitioners on 26-8-1954 and on the very next day, it was alleged the petitioners trespassed upon the land in violation of the order. On 30-8-1954 an application was filed by Annada Prosad Dalui in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Uluberia complaining of disobedience to the order which had been promulgated on the 24th. After a preliminary inquiry it












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top