SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Cal) 182

CHAKRABARTI, LAHIRI
KUMAR JAGADISH CHANDRA SINHA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, E.R.Meyer, Jatindra Mohan Banerji, Manik Mitter

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE points involved in this Reference are a little out of the common and have afforded some relief from the dreariness of the ordinary Income-tax Reference. The most interesting of the points raised by Dr. Pal had, however, to be ruled out, as it did not seem to us to arise out of the appellate order. Also, of the three questions referred, two were ultimately abandoned as it was conceded that, on the materials on record, they could not be answered.

( 2 ) THE assessee is one Kumar Jagadish Chandra Sinha, who is an individual resident and ordinarily resident in India. He owns a zemindary situated wholly in the district of Jessore which, as a result of the Partition, went to Pakistan with effect from 15-8-1947. The assessee observes the Bengali Calendar year in maintaining his accounts. In the accounting year 1354 B. S. , corresponding to 14-4-1947, to the 13-4-1948, the assessee received from his zemindary in Jessore an income of 1,85,380/ -. It is not disputed that the money was rent derived from land used for agricultural purposes, but it was Income of a period, during a part of which the land belonged to undivided India and during the remaining part it






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top