SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 169

BACHAWAT
LUXMI CHAND BAIJNATH – Appellant
Versus
KISHANLAL SOHONLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.BHABRA, G.P.KAR, TABRIWAL

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application to declare that the arbitration agreement and the awards are void, illegal and inoperative and for setting aside the awards.

( 2 ) BY the two separate contracts dated 12/8/1953 the petitioner agreed to purchase blankets from the respondent. I have looked at the original contracts which are in Hindi and I accept the Official Translation to be correct. Each of the contracts contained the following arbitration clause:"if there arise any dispute or trouble regarding this contract, then the same shall be decided by the Arbitration Board of the Blanket and Shawl Traders' Association or by the arbitrators appointed by the buyer and by the seller one (by) each both of whom shall be senior traders, (and such decision) shall be accepted by both persons -- (buyer and seller), and the said decision shall be deemed as the final decision. "

( 3 ) PART of the goods were delivered. The respondent claims the balance of the price of goods sold and delivered. The petitioner counter-claims for damages for not delivering the balance goods.

( 4 ) THE respondent appointed Shri Ram Nath Bagaria as his arbitrator and by notice dated 16/2/1954 requested the petit





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top