BACHAWAT
LUXMI CHAND BAIJNATH – Appellant
Versus
KISHANLAL SOHONLAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application to declare that the arbitration agreement and the awards are void, illegal and inoperative and for setting aside the awards.
( 2 ) BY the two separate contracts dated 12/8/1953 the petitioner agreed to purchase blankets from the respondent. I have looked at the original contracts which are in Hindi and I accept the Official Translation to be correct. Each of the contracts contained the following arbitration clause:"if there arise any dispute or trouble regarding this contract, then the same shall be decided by the Arbitration Board of the Blanket and Shawl Traders' Association or by the arbitrators appointed by the buyer and by the seller one (by) each both of whom shall be senior traders, (and such decision) shall be accepted by both persons -- (buyer and seller), and the said decision shall be deemed as the final decision. "
( 3 ) PART of the goods were delivered. The respondent claims the balance of the price of goods sold and delivered. The petitioner counter-claims for damages for not delivering the balance goods.
( 4 ) THE respondent appointed Shri Ram Nath Bagaria as his arbitrator and by notice dated 16/2/1954 requested the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.