SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 171

K.C.DAS GUPTA, DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
CHANDI CHARAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILABALA DASI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DURGA CHARAN ROY CHOUDHURY, MANINDRA NATH GHOSH, SURENDRA NARAYAN SARKAR

K. C. DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS case raises the question of valuation of the subject-matter of a suit where the provisions of Section 8 of the Suits Valuation Act are not applicable. The petitioner brought the present suit for possession of certain lands on the averment that the defendant was a licensee thereof and that the licence had been revoked. There was also a prayer for mesne profits. The suit was valued for the purpose of jurisdiction at Rs. 110/ -.

( 2 ) ON an objection being raised by the opposite side that the Munsif's court had no jurisdiction to try the suit, the learned Munsif considered the question and came to the conclusion that the value of the suit for purposes of jurisdiction was well above the pecuniary jurisdiction of his court. On appeal the learned Subordinate Judge affirmed the learned Munsif's finding,

( 3 ) BOTH parties agreed that the court-fees are payable on the plaint in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 (v), Court-fees Act "according to the value of the subject-matter". The clause itself contains provisions indicating what such value shall be deemed to be where the subject-matter is land. It is not disputed that calculated on that basis th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top