SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 198

P.N.MUKHERJEE
HARADHONE HALDAR – Appellant
Versus
USHA CHARAN KARMAKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SATINDRA NATH ROY CHUDHARY, SOVENDRA MADHAB BOSE, Syamacharan Mitter

P. N. MUKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a concurrent decree of the two courts below, allowing the plaintiff-respondent's alternative claim for pre-emption under Section 4, Partition Act.

( 2 ) THE suit properties (C. S. plot No Section 113, 114 and 116) which constitute the undivided family dwelling house of the plaintiff and his brother Kangsari Mohan Karmakar, the predecessor of respondents Nos. 2 and 3, belonged to them in equal moiety shares. In 1930, the present defendant-appellant (who was a stranger to the family) auction-purchased Kangsari's. half share of the suit properties. He got symbolical possession sometime in April, 1930, but he failed to get actual possession. Thereupon, he brought a suit (Title Suit No. 55 of 1931) against Kangsari and the present plaintiff for 'inter alia' joint possession of the suit properties along with the present plaintiff and, having recovered an 'ex parte' decree on 30-11-1931, he took joint possession by removing the huts of Kangsari, sometime in 1946. In the meantime, the present plaintiff had instituted a suit (Title Suit No, 280 of 1945) for the setting aside of the above 'ex parte' decree but it was unsuccessful up














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top