SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 199

K.C.DAS GUPTA, DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
CHHATUMULL CHOWTHMULL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHABESH NARAYAN BOSE, MANOHAR SAHAY, PRITI BURMAN

K. C. DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner brought this suit for recovery of damages for the loss of 10 maunds 16 seers of jute. His case is that on 23-8-1951, the delivered 125 bales of four maunds of jute per bale to the Station Master, Gaibandha, on a railway in Eastern Pakistan, for carriage to Cossipore Road Station on the Eastern Railway in the Union of India and that when the consignment, after being unloaded from the railway wagon at Cossipore Road was lying in the goods shed under the care of the Eastern Railway, it got soaked in rain on account of the negligence of the Eastern Railway and resulted in the loss of 10 maunds 16 seers. The defendant denied negligence but also pleaded that there was no contract between the plaintiff and the defendant and further that as the consignee had not taken delivery of the consignment within a reasonable time, the Railway was not liable. There was also a plea of want of notice under Section 77, Railways Act, and Section 80, Civil P. C.

( 2 ) THE trial Court had accepted the defence ' contention that there was no proper service of notice under Section 80, Civil P. C. , and further that there was no contract between the plaintiff and the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top