SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 48

SINHA
PROVAT CHANDRA SIRCAR – Appellant
Versus
R. C. SEN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE BUDGE BUDGE MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Page 1 of 8

1955-CALWN-58-443 , 1955-AIR (CAL)-0-83 , 1955 (TLS)512372

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA

Coram : Sinha

Civil Rule 153  Of  1954

(FEBRUARY 26, 1954)

PROVAT CHANDRA SIRCAR VS. R. C. SEN, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE BUDGE BUDGE MUNICIPALITY

( 1 ) THE facts in this case are as follows:

( 2 ) THE Budge Budge Municipality consists of five wards. It began to function with 10 Commissioners on and from 4-2-1948 for a term of 4 years. As the term of 4 years for which the Commissioners were to function was about to expire, it was directed that a fresh election of the Commissioners of the Municipality (12 seats) would be held on 8-3-1952. I am informed that about 37 nominations were filed of which only 8 were found valid. The result was that these 8 candidates were returned unopposed under Rule 22 (2) of the Election Rules. On 1-4-1952, it was notified under Section 26, Bengal Municipal Act (hereinafter called the Act) that the election of the remaining 4 members would be held on 31-5-1952. In the first week of April, 1952, eight out of the ten members of the old Municipality which was then functioning resigned, and these eight members ceased to attend any further meetings or to take any interes








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top