SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 14

CHAKRABARTI, S.R.DAS GUPTA
COMMR OF EXCESS PROFITS TAX, WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
RUBY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.SEN, BALAI LAL PAL, E.R.Meyer, K.P.KHAITAN

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from a judgment and order of a Division Bench of this Court, dated 10-9-1953, rendered and made upon a reference under Section 21, Excess Profitst Tax Act, read with Section 66a (2) of the Indian Income-tax Act.

( 2 ) THE case has had a history. It appears that assessments of the respondent Insurance Company to Excess Profits Tax for three chargeable accounting periods, namely, those ending on 31-12-1939, 31-12-1940 and 31-12-1941, were taken up at one and the same time and in respect of all the three assessments, a common question of law was raised. That question was whether in computing the average amount of capital, the sums standing to the credit of the Fire Insurance Fund, Marine Insurance Fund, Motor and Accident Insurance Fund and Reserves for Exceptional Losses, could be properly deducted under Rule, 2 Schedule II, read with the explanatory sub-paragraph attached to the Rule in the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. The principal contention of the assessee company appears to have been that reserves for un-expired risks could not be held to the "accruing liabilities" within the meaning of













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top