K.C.DAS GUPTA, MITTER, SEN GUPTA
YUSUF SK. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal involves a point of law of great importance in the administration of criminal justice, and as we find ourselves in respectful disagreement with at least one decision of a Division Bench of this Court, that of Roxburgh and Blank, JJ. in -- 'ashiruddin Ahmed v. The King', AIR 1949 Cal 182 (A), I feel it to be our duty to refer the question for the decision of a Full Bench to be constituted by the learned Chief Justice. My learned brother is, however, of the opinion that the said decision is not binding upon us and that the matter should accordingly rest here. I do not agree. Moreover, the point of law is of such importance that it deserves to be considered by a fuller Bench. This case must, therefore, be placed before the learned Chief Justice for such action as he may be minded to take.
( 2 ) THE point of law involved concerns the nature and extent of the burden which is placed upon an accused by Section 105, Evidence Act which is as follows :"when a person is accused for any offence, the burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the general Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code, or within any special exception or p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.