SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 22

P.N.MUKHERJEE
MAHADEO PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SULEKHA SARKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MUKHERJEE, Hemanta Krishna Mitra, JATISH CHANDRA GUHA

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant was a monthly tenant under the respondent landlady in respect of what may be called the garage room at premises No. 171-A Lansdowne Road, Calcutta, at a rental of Rs. 18/- per month. The tenancy was terminated by a notice to quit under Section 111 (h), Transfer of Property Act on and from the 1-5-1949 and the tenant having failed to vacate the room in question in terms of the said notice, the present suit for ejectment was filed on the 7-6-1949.

( 2 ) IN the plaint there was a specific allegation that the disputed room was required by the plaintiff landlady bona fide for her own use and occupation, namely, as a garage for her car and, upon such allegation, it was pleaded that the Rent Control Act of 1948 which was then in force would not stand in the way of her getting of a decree for ejectment.

( 3 ) THE defence denied the truth of the plaintiff's allegation and claimed protection under the Rent Control law.

( 4 ) THE learned Munsif accepted the plaintiff's case and gave her a decree. On appeal this decision was affirmed by the learned Subordinate Judge who accepted the learned Munsif s finding in the plaintiff's favour and also rejected











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top