SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 134

CHAKRABARTI, LAHIRI
FATEH CHAND MURLIDHAR – Appellant
Versus
JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, AMIYA KUMAR BOSE, G.P.KAR, R.C.Deb

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of S. R. Das Gupta, J. , dated 29-6-1953, by which the learned Judge set aside an award in favour of the appellants on the ground that in making it without any evidence in its support, the arbitrators had misconducted the proceedings.

( 2 ) THE facts are as follows. On 3-11-1951, the appellants, Messrs. Fatehchand Murlidhar, agreed to sell and the respondents, Messrs. Juggilal Kamlapat, agreed to buy, 15,000 pieces of Wool Packs at the fate of Rs. 11/12/- per piece. The goods were to be delivered in three equal instalments of 5,000 pieces each on 25-11-1951, 15-12-1951, and 7-1-1952, respectively. Delivery of the first two instalments was duly given and no question arises with regard to them. With regard to the third instalment due to be delivered on the 7-1-1952, shipping instructions were given on 20-12-1951, for placing the goods alongside a vessel, called "pantakota". Admittedly, the goods were not delivered and ordinarily there would be a breach of the contract on the part of the appellants. On 11-1-1952, however, the respondents forwarded to the appellants further shipping instructions which they had received from th

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top