SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 69

R.P.MOOKERJEE, RENUPADA MUKHERJEE
KALIDAS GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
MUGNEERAM BANGUR AND CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARABINDA GUHA, ATUL CHANDRA GUPTA, Jitendra Kumar Sen Gupta, NANI KUMAR CHAKRAVARTY

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff and is directed against a judgment and decree passed by the Additional Subordinate Judge, Fourth Court, 24-Parganas in Title Suit No. 12/1948/171/1946 of his Court.

( 2 ) THE suit was instituted by the plaintiff for a declaration that a, certain contract between himself, and the respondent was subsisting at the date of the suit, and he was entitled to get a decree for specific performance of it by having a conveyance from the respondent. It will be seen later that although the suit was brought as a declaratory suit the substantial relief which could be given to the plaintiff in this case is a decree for specific performance of the alleged contract.

( 3 ) THE suit was contested by the respondent and it was dismissed by the trial Court on the ground that in this case time was of the essence of the contract, and the, defendant was justified in avoiding the contract because of the failure of the plaintiff to perform his part of the contract witnin the time stipulated in it. The plaintiff has preferred this appeal against the above judgment and decree.

( 4 ) THE points requiring decision in this appeal are: (1) Was time














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top