SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 67

MITTER, SEN GUPTA
JAGDISH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, N.K.Basu, PASHUPATI GHOSH, SUNIL KUMAR BASU

MTTTER, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was directed against the petitioner's conviction under Section 407 read with Section 488, Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923, for having sold adulterated mustard oil. The prosecution case was based upon an analysis of a sample of the oil concerned disclosing' a saponification value of 177,8. The petitioner's defence was thai the oil was pure.

( 2 ) THE validity of the conviction depends upon the construction to be placed upon the relative words of two Government Notifications, numbered respectively 735 P. H. and 736 P. H. , both dated 20-3-1928, issued in exercise of the power conferred by Section 422 of the Act.

( 3 ) THE material part of Section 407 of the Act is in these terms:"407 (1) No person shall directly or indirectly, himself or by any other person on his behalf, sell, expose or hawk about for sale, or manufacture or store for sale, any of the following articles, namely,. . . . . (e) mustard oil,. . . . . unless the following conditions are fulfilled, namely,. . . . . (v) in the case of mustard oil it shall be derived exclusively from mustard seed;"it is clear from the section that what is prohibited is the sale etc. of mustard oil which is not der





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top