K.C.CHUNDER
JAMINI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
DHIRENDRA NATH KUNDU – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued at the instance of a tenant who has been ordered by the Munsif to deposit rent under Section 14 (4), West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950.
( 2 ) THE point urged before me is that in the written statement there was an allegation that there was no relationship of landlord and tenant. Therefore, no deposit should have been ordered. It appears that in a previous proceeding between the same parties the question whether there was a relationship of landlord and tenant between these two parties themselves was raised and was decided against the petitioner. That case was dismissed on another ground. Over and above this, when Section 14 (4) application came to be heard, the petitioner himself was examined. His deposition was that there was an adjustment of some dues over the value of betel purchased from him against the cost awarded in the previous suit and the rent due to the plaintiff. He himself, therefore, accepted that he was a tenant and that rent was due. He pleaded a story of adjustment which the Munsif rightly disbelieved, the reasons having been given in his judgment.
( 3 ) UNDER the circumstances, it is f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.