SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 18

S.R.DAS GUPTA
SUBURBAN BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.ROY, M.E.MEYER, R.Choudhary

S. R. DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) I make the following order: (a) The payment of the Provident Fund to Mr. Chowdhuri's clients will be made on the basis that the total amount, as appearing in the books of the Bank, contributed by the staff and by the Bank is Rs. 25,615-12-0. (b) I declare that Mr. Chowdhuri's clients, namely -1. Provash Chandra Cheena of No. 12, Froddonath Lane, Calcutta, 2. Amal Kumar Chatterjee of No. 287 1b, Jhamapukur Lane, Calcutta, 3. Ashit Ranjan Das of No. 57, Cossipore Road in the suburbs of Calcutta, 4. Dilip Kumar Ghosh of No. 17, Jhamaphukur Lane, Calcutta, 5. Rajendra Kumar Chakraborty of No. 6, Muralidhar Sen Lane, Calcutta, 6, Sushil Kumar Majumdar of No. 19, Strand Road, Calcutta. , 7. Kanai Charan Maity of No. 12, Bipradas Street, Calcutta, are entitled to their wages from 1st May upto the end of August 1948 and they will rank as preferential creditors in respect of wages for the last two months i. e. July and August 1948 and for the wages for the remaining months they would be treated as ordinary creditors. The Liquidator will be entitled to settle the claims of other employees if and when they make their claims. The Liquidator will write to Court and ob






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top