SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 153

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
R. P. Mookerjee, Renupada Mukherjee
LUTFAR RAHAMAN LASKAR HAJI KABADALI NASKAR - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
Civil Rule 500  Of  1953
Decided On : JULY 08, 1953

Advocates Appeared:
JAJNESWAR MAJUMDAR, Nitya Ranjan Biswas

The procedure for appearance on behalf of Government or public officers sued in their official capacity is contained in Order 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure. A Government Pleader need only intimate to the court that he is representing the Government in the proceedings before the Court. No stamped power or Vakalatnama is required to be filed.

Headnote:

CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE - Appearance of Government Pleader - Representation of Government and Public Officers - Filing of Counter-Affidavit by Advocate without Power of Attorney.

Fact of the Case:

The issue before the court was whether the Government Pleader could be taken to have appeared for opposite parties who were officers of the Government and whether a counter-affidavit prepared by an Advocate without a power of attorney could be received.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Government Pleader could not be taken to have appeared for the opposite parties as the procedure laid down under Order 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure had not been followed. The court also held that the counter-affidavit filed by the Advocate without a power of attorney could not be received.

Issues: 1. Whether the Government Pleader should be taken to have appeared for opposite parties nos. 2 and 3 who are officers of the Government? 2. Whether the counter affidavit prepared in the office of Sri Smriti Kumar Roy Choudhury, Advocate, may be received although he has not filed any power on behalf of any one of the three opposite parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Order 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which lays down the procedure for appearance on behalf of Government or public officers sued in their official capacity. The court held that the Government Pleader had not followed the procedure laid down in the Rules and had not furnished the necessary particulars. The court also relied on Order 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which lays down the conditions under which a party may be represented by an agent or by a lawyer. The court held that the Advocate who had filed the counter-affidavit did not have the authority to do so as he had not filed a power of attorney.

Final Decision: The court held that the Government Pleader could not be taken to have appeared for the opposite parties and that the counter-affidavit filed by the Advocate without a power of attorney could not be received.

R. P. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) IN this matter two points have been raised before us for decision : (1) Whether the Government Pleader should be taken to have appeared for opposite parties nos. 2 and 3 who are officers of the Government; and (2) whether the counter affidavit prepared in the office of Sri Smriti Kumar Roy Choudhury, Advocate, may be received although he has not filed any power on behalf of any one of the three opposite parties.

( 2 ) THE procedure to be followed for appearance on behalf of Government or public officers sued in their official capacity is contained in Order 27, Civil P. C. Under Rule 2 of the said Order persons being ex-officio or otherwise authorised to act for the Government in respect of any judicial proceeding shall be deemed to be recognised agents by whom appearances, acts and applications under this Code may be made or done on behalf of the Government. Rule 8 of the said Order lays down the procedure in suits against a public officer :" (1) Where the Government undertakes the defence of a suit against a public officer, the Government Pleader upon being furnished with authority to appear and answer the plaint, shall apply to the Court, and upon such application the Court shall cause a note of his authority to be entered in the register of civil suits. (2) Where no application under Sub-rule (1) is made by the Government pleader on or before the day fixed in the notice for the defendant to appear and answer, the case shall proceed as in a suit between private parties. "

( 3 ) RULE 8b of the said order defines a Government Pleader which means :" (a) in relation to any suit by or against the Central Government, or against a public officer in the service of that Government, the Central Government and such pleader as that Government may appoint whether generally or specially for the purpose of this Order : (c) in relation to any suit by or against a State Government or against a public Officer in the service of a State, the State Government and the Government Pleader as defined in Clause (7) of Section 2, or such other pleader as the State Government may appoint, whether gene rally or specially, for the purpose of this Order. "the other relevant provision in the Code of Civil Procedure to which reference need be made is the definition of Government Pleader as it appears in Section 2 (7) of the Code :" 'government Pleader' includes any officer appointed by the State Government to perform all or any of the functions expressly imposed by this Code on the Government Pleader and also any pleader acting under the directions of the Government Pleader. "

( 4 ) IT is clear from the provisions referred to above that a Government Pleader need only intimate to the court, that he is representing the Government in the proceedings before the Court. No stamped power or Vakalatnama is required to be filed. This is a special provision which makes it possible for the State to appear through the Government pleader without the formality of filing a stamped vakalatnama.

( 5 ) THE appearance, therefore, in the present proceedings by the Government Pleader on behalf of opposite party No. 1 -- the State of West Bengal -- must be accepted as an intimation, as stated above, was given by the Government Pleader to the Court on 11-5-1953.

( 6 ) THE present Rule in which the points for decision have been raised was issued as against three parties, viz. , (1) the State of West Bengal, (2) The Director of Procurement, and (3) The Assessor Inspector. Under Rule 8 of Order 27, Civil P. C. only if the Government undertakes the defence of a suit against a public officer, the Government Pleader upon being furnished with authority to appear is to apply to the Court and upon such application the Court is to cause a note of his authority to be entered in the Court records. In the present case all that the Government Pleader did was to add in the memorandum which was filed by him, intimating his appearance on behalf of the State of West B










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top