SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 161

CHUNDER
SADANANDA JASH – Appellant
Versus
SHIBAKALI HAZRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIRESWAR CHATTERJI, NIRMAL CHANDRA CHAKRAVARTY, PANCHANAN CHAUDHARY

CHUNDER, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued at the instance of a school-master against an order of the Additional District Magistrate of Burdwan acquitting the" opposite party of an offence under Section 504, Penal Code. Although it is a revision I have been compelled by Mr. Panchanan Chaudhuri with his usual eloquence to hear what was really a full appeal on facts and law against the acquittal. I am of the same opinion as the learned District Magistrate and hold that the accused was rightly acquitted.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that between the complainant's brother and the accused there was a criminal case over a land dispute and In the course of a conversation in connection therewith for arriving at a compromise of the case before the Head Master of the school an occurrence took place. The learned District Magistrate points out that the only reliable witness in the case Is the Head Master who being the head of an educational institution deserves to be fully believed. The Head Master's version is that in the course of the conversation in a very mild manner the accused told the school master "apni nichhe katha bol-chhen" (you are telling a lie ). For this the school master rushed to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top