SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 137

G.N.DAS, DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
SURENDRA NATH – Appellant
Versus
S. M. MURSHED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dipti Kana Bose, HEMENDRA KUMAR DAS, NANI COOMAR CHAKRABORTY, TARAPADA KUMAR PAL

G. N. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the judgment of Bose J. dated the 2nd December, 1952.

( 2 ) THE appeal arises out of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of an appropriate writ or order directing the respondent not to give effect to the order of supersession of the Budge Budge Municipality.

( 3 ) THE facts which have been found by Bose J. may be set forth as follows. The Budge Budge Municipality began to function with ten Commissioners on and from the 4th of February, 1948 for a term of four years. On the 17th of February, 1951 the appellant was elected the Chairman of the Municipality under section 45 of the Bengal Municipal Act. On the 23rd of August, 1951 the State Government confirmed the appointment of the appellant as Chairman under section 46 of the Bengal Municipal Act. As the term of four years for which the Commissioners were to function, was about to expire it was directed that a fresh election of the Commissioners of the Budge Budge Municipality numbering twelve would be held on the 8th of March, 1952. It appears, however, that only eight nomi- nation papers for eight different constituencies of the said Municipality were file
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top