SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 196

SINHA
TAPENDRA NATH ROY – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.CHAUDHARY, VINYAK BANERJI

SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a rule issued upon the respondent to show cause why an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ should not be issued by this Court cancelling or quashing the order under which the petitioner has been made eligible only to sit for a Compartmental B. Sc. Examination, or why an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ should not be issued directing the respondents to declare that the applicant has passed the B. Sc. Examination held in 1953, and for other reliefs.

( 2 ) THE facts are shortly as follows. The petitioner was sent up by the Surendranath College, a College affiliated to the Calcutta University, for the Bachelor of Science Examination for the year 1953. He duly appeared therein, in three subjects, namely, Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry. The marks obtained by the petitioner in the said examination are as follows : . Marks Obtained Full marks.

Mathematics (Pass) 225 300

Physics (Pass)

Theoretical 125 200

Practical 57 100

. 182

 

Chemistry (Pass).

Theoretical 93 200

Practical 32 100

. 125

 

. . 532 900

 

The petitioner has not been declared to have passed th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top