SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 197

P.N.MUKHERJEE, SEN GUPTA
SATYADHYAN GHOSAL – Appellant
Versus
DEORAJIN DEBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jitendra Kumar Sen Gupta, NALINI RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, Sudhanshu Bhusan Sen

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against an order of Munsif, 2nd Court, Alipore, rejecting an application under Section 28 of the Thika Tenancy Act, 1949.

( 2 ) THE opposite parties Satya Dhan Ghosal and others as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 40 of 1947 against the petitioners Deorajin Debi and another for their ejectment from some Bustee land at No, 49/5, Circular Garden Beach Road. There was also a claim for arrears of rent and mesne profits, in the plaint which was filed on February 8, 1947, the petitioners were described as monthly Bharatia tenants. The defendant petitioners filed a written statement on May 22, 1947, and the suit was still pending on October 26, 1948, when the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Ordinance, 1948, came into force.

( 3 ) THE defendant petitioners did not ultimately contest the suit which was decreed ex parte on February 10, 1949. But though the suit was decreed ex parte and no issue was raised as to the nature of the tenancy, the learned Munsif made an observation that the defendants were thika tenants and that the decree would be subject to the provisions of the Thaka Tenancy Ordinance. It may be mentioned here that the Thika T




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top