SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 80

GUHA
SASANKA SEKHAR HAZRA – Appellant
Versus
CHARU CHANDRA DUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NIRMAL CHANDRA CHOUDHURI, PANCHANAN CHAUDHARY, PURUSHOTHAM CHATTERJI

GUHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff arises out of a suit for declaration of title and confirmation of possession in respect of C. S. plot No. 8041 measuring 3. 02 acres of Shali land recorded in the khatian No, 2766 of Mouza Bara Balun in the name of pro forma defendants 2 to 4. The plaintiff who was a mortgagee purchased the above holding by a kabala on 28-10-1940. In execution of a rent decree, however, the same holding is alleged to have been purchased by the landlord defendant on 20-8-1940. In the execution petition, sale proclamation and the sale certificate there is alleged to have been misdescription of the holding in that plot numbers were described therein as C. S. plots 12049, 12050 and 12051 (instead of C. S. plot 8041) and the area was also wrongly stated to be 90 acres instead of 3. 02 acres. On an application for amendment to the executing Court by the defendants appellants who alleged that they detected the mistake at the time of taking delivery of possession through Court the amendment was allowed on 10-9-43 and the sale certificate was brought in conformity with Khatian 2766. Subsequent applications by the present plaintiff under Section 174, B. T. Act und









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top