SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 33

CHAKRABARTI, SINHA
NITYANANDA ROY – Appellant
Versus
RASHBEHARI ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GURUDAS BHUTTACHARJYYA

CHAKRAVARTTI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has been convicted of two offences under Section 406, Penal. Code under two separate counts. The "acts charged against him are that he committed criminal breach of trust in respect of 3 tolas and 5 annas of gold on 5-2-1951 and that similarly he committed the same offence In respect of a further quantity of 26 tolas and 9 annas of gold on 2-3-1951. The learned Magistrate has accepted the prosecution case and sentenced the petitioner to rigorous imprisonment for 4 months and 2 months respectively -- the sentences to run concurrently.

( 2 ) THE proceedings were commenced on the complaint of one Rashbehari Ray who alleged that he was a goldsmith, carrying on business at Cuttack and that he used to get the articles of his trade manufactured by workmen in Calcutta of whom the petitioner was one. The petitioner is also related to the complainant, being his nephew. The complainant's case further was that he had entrusted 29 tolas 14 annas and 3 pies of gold on 2-3-1951, and that the ornaments manufactured with that gold were due to be delivered in about a fortnight's time. When, however, the complainant demanded delivery of the ornaments he was put







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top