1952 Supreme(Cal) 30
HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Harries, Banerjee
HINDUSTHAN CO-OPERATIVE INSURANCE SOCIETY LTD. - Appellant
Versus
SHYAM SUNDER - Respondent
Civil Appeal 66 Of 1951
Decided On : FEBRUARY 19, 1952
A.K.HAZRA, ATUL CHANDRA GUPTA, H.N.SANYAL, S.C.SEN
An offer can be accepted by the performance of an act, and the offerer may dispense with the necessity of communicating the acceptance.
Headnote:
INSURANCE - Acceptance of Proposal - Appropriation of Cheque - Implied Acceptance - Communication of Acceptance Not Necessary - Contract Completed.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased applied for an insurance policy with the appellant company. He underwent medical examinations and submitted a proposal form along with a cheque for the first half-yearly premium. The company cashed the cheque but later denied liability, claiming that the proposal was not accepted.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the company had accepted the proposal by cashing the cheque. The court inferred that the deceased had indicated the mode of acceptance by sending the cheque with the proposal form, and that the company had accepted the offer in the manner indicated by the deceased when they paid the cheque into their account.
Issues: Whether the company's cashing of the cheque constituted acceptance of the proposal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the company's cashing of the cheque constituted acceptance of the proposal. The court reasoned that the deceased had indicated the mode of acceptance by sending the cheque with the proposal form, and that the company had accepted the offer in the manner indicated by the deceased when they paid the cheque into their account. The court further held that communication of acceptance was not necessary in this case, as the company had dispensed with the need for such communication by cashing the cheque.
Final Decision: The court upheld the trial court's decree in favor of the plaintiffs, holding that the company was liable to pay the insurance money.
( 1 ) IN this appeal we are asked to reverse a decree made or 1st December 1950, by S. R. Das Gupta J. , upholding the plaintiffs' claim to recover Rs. 10,000 from the appellant Insurance Company, a defendant in the action. The plaintiffs' title to the money is not disputed. The only question raised in this appeal is whether the Company is under any liability to pay the money and that depends on as to whether the proposal of the deceased was accepted by the Insurance Company.
( 2 ) THE plaintiffs' 'case, as related in the Court below by plaintiff 1, (a brother of the deceased), so far as it is necessary to be stated for the purpose of this judgment, is as follows: In or about the first week of January 1939, at the request of N. P. Das an organiser of the company and also a defendant to the suit, the deceased verbally agreed to insure his life for the sum above mentioned on an endowment policy. The deceased was medically examined at Soro, in the district of Balasore, on 5-1-1939, by a doctor employed by the company. After the medical examination, the organiser told the deceased that the doctor had found his life to be first class, and that if he submitted the proposal form and deposited the half-yearly premium without delay, the company would, accept his life for insurance and would issue a policy promptly. Plaintiff 1 and the deceased again went to Soro, in the afternoon, of 6-1-1939, and on that date it was settled that the insurance would be for the sum of Bs. 10,000 on an endowment policy of 21 years, the half-yearly premium payable being Rs. 295-10-0. The proposal form was filled in, was signed by the deceased and made over to the organiser with a cheque for Rs. 295-10-0, drawn on the Central Bank of India in favour of the company, being the sum payable for the half-yearly premium. The organiser gave a receipt for the cheque as being the " half-yearly premium for a proposal of Rs. 10,000 with Hindusthan Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd. , Calcutta, in advance. "
( 3 ) IT appears from the prospectus of the company that all premiums are payable at the head-office of the company in Calcutta; but if it suits the convenience of the policyholders they may pay the premium at any branch office or agency office specially empowered to collect premiums on behalf of the company. It also appears from the prospectus that the company has opened accounts with banks in most places of importance and premium may also be paid in such banks, free of charge. The organisers or authorised agents as they are called, are empowered to receive and forward proposals for insurance and arrange for medical examination; but they have no authority to receive any premium as such. It is quite clear therefore that when in this case the organiser received the cheque from the deceased, he had no authority to receive it as premium on behalf of the company.
( 4 ) IT appears from the evidence of plaintiff l that after the cheque was paid, the organiser said to the deceased that the policy would be issued in no time and received by the deceased in five or six days' time. When the conversation took place, plaintiff 1, the organiser, an agent of the company and the doctor were present. It has been further said by plaintiff 1 that three or four days thereafter, that is to say, on 10th or 11-1-1939, he met the organiser in the Court-house at Balasore, and the organiser told him that the deceased had been medically examined once, but according to the rules of the company would have to be examined once again, and that he would send a doctor very soon from Cuttack for the purpose. On 15-1-1939, a doctor of the name of Earn Chandra Eau came to the village of the deceased and held the second medical examination. After such examination, the doctor expressed his view that it was a first class life. "when he said this, the organiser was present. The organiser said that as soon as the report of the second medical examination was received by the company, the ri