HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Bose
BIJOY RANJAN - Appellant
Versus
B. C. DAS GUPTA, PRESIDENT, GOVERNING BODY, STATE MEDICAL FACULTY OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
Civil Revn 2295 Of 1951
Decided On : FEBRUARY 4, 1952
MEDICAL EXAMINATION - CANCELLATION OF EXAMINATION - UNFAIR MEANS - NATURAL JUSTICE - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - STATE MEDICAL FACULTY - IMPLEADING PARTIES - INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES - GENERAL CLAUSES ACT, 1897 - ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION - ARTICLE 367 OF THE CONSTITUTION - RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE STATE MEDICAL FACULTY - ORDER IN COUNCIL DATED 11-8-1914 - BENGAL GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2545 MEDL. - INDIAN MEDICAL DEGREES ACT (ACT 7 OF 1916) - WRITS OF MANDAMUS - ORDER 1 RULE 8, CIVIL P. C. - RULE 16 OF THE RULES FOR CONDUCT OF EXAMINATIONS - NAKKUDA ALI V. . M. F. DE S. JAYARATNE - S. K. GHOSE V. VICE CHANCELLOR OF UTKAL UNIVERSITY - COOPER V. WANDSWORTH BOARD OF WORKS - DR. BENTLEY'S CASE - DAWKINS V. ANTROBUS - HOPKINS V. SMETHWICK LOCAL BOARD - WOOD V. WOOD - AMBALAL SARABHAI V. PHIROZ H. ANTIA - M. S. EZRA V. MAHENDRA BANERJEE
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a medical student, appeared for the Intermediate Licentiateship Medical examination conducted by the State Medical Faculty of West Bengal in June 1951. He passed in two subjects but failed in Anatomy. Under the rules, he was permitted to appear in the Anatomy paper at the next examination. He appeared for the Anatomy paper in the June term examination held in 1951 and fared well in the theoretical, oral, and practical examinations. However, the Governing Body of the State Medical Faculty resolved to cancel the entire examination for all 51 candidates, including the petitioner, due to allegations of unfair means. The petitioner challenged the order of cancellation as illegal, arbitrary, and against the principles of natural justice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no detection of unfair means during the examination and that the Governing Body's decision to cancel the entire examination was based solely on the reports of the examiners and inspectors, without any independent inquiry or opportunity for the candidates to offer an explanation. The court held that the Governing Body acted unreasonably and in violation of the principles of natural justice by not giving the candidates an opportunity to dispel the suspicion of unfair means.
Issues: 1. Whether the Governing Body of the State Medical Faculty was justified in cancelling the entire examination in Anatomy held in June 1951. 2. Whether the Governing Body acted reasonably and in accordance with the principles of natural justice in cancelling the examination without giving the candidates an opportunity to offer an explanation.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Governing Body's decision to cancel the entire examination was based solely on the reports of the examiners and inspectors, without any independent inquiry or opportunity for the candidates to offer an explanation. 2. The Governing Body acted unreasonably and in violation of the principles of natural justice by not giving the candidates an opportunity to dispel the suspicion of unfair means.
Final Decision: The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties to revoke the order of cancellation of the examination and to publish the results of the said examination. The court also directed the opposite parties to be at liberty to inquire into the individual case of the candidate concerned and to take such steps as they are entitled to take in accordance with law.
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for an appropriate writ directing the opposite parties to withdraw or revoke the order of cancellation of the Intermediate Licentiateship Medical examination held at the Burdwan centre in June 1051 and to publish the results of the said examination. The petitioner is a Matriculate of the University of Calcutta. In 1947 he got himself admitted into the Chittagong Medical School in Eastern Pakistan for the purpose of obtaining a L. M. F. Diploma. In 1948 the petitioner passed the Primary examination. In February 1950 owing to communal disturbances in Eastern Pakistan the petitioner and his family came over to India as refugees. After coming to India, the petitioner continued his medical studies and got himself admitted in the Burdwan Ronaldshay Medical School, which is an institution run by the State Medical Faculty of West Bengal. In November 1960 the petitioner appeared in the Intermediate examination conducted by the said Faculty and out of the 3 subjects prescribed for such examination the petitioner passed in two subjects namely Physiology and Pharmacology but was unsuccessful in the 3rd subject namely Anatomy. Under R, 4 of the Rules and Regulations of the said Medical Faculty relating to Intermediate Licentiateship examination a candidate who fails in one subject only is on payment of a certain fee permitted to appear in that subject at the next 6 monthly examination and if he passes he shall be held to have passed the entire examination, but a candidate failing to pass or appear under this provision shall be required to appear in all subjects of the examination. By virtue of this rule the petitioner got a chance to appear in the Anatomy paper at the June term examination in 1951. In April 1951 the medical school where the petitioner was prosecuting his studies held a test examination and the petitioner stood first in Anatomy. Thereafter the petitioner appeared at the June term of the Intermediate examination of the Medical Faculty which was held on or about 7-6-1951. Under the rules the petitioner had to sit for a theoretical examination in Anatomy and also for oral and practical examination. The theoretical examination was held on the aforesaid date namely 7-6-1951 and on 18-6-1951 the oral and practical examinations were held. It is alleged that the petitioner fared well in all these examinations. It appears that about 71 students from different schools in West Bengal appeared in the said examination of the June term held in the Burdwan centre. Under the rules and regulations framed for the conduct of these medical examinations the examinations at the different centres are conducted under the supervision of a presiding officer, inspectors, convenor and invigilators. It appears that so far as this June term examination in Burdwan centre was concerned there was no unhappy incident during the examination. There was no case of detection of any unfair means being adopted by any of the candidates and there was no case of any expulsion from the examination hall for taking any unfair means and there was no adverse report by either the presiding officer or the inspectors or the invigilators conducting the examination. It further appears from the rules and regulations for the conduct of the medical examination that the examiners who conduct oral and practical examinations are to examine and look over the written theoretical papers of the examinees before they take up oral and practical examinations of these examinees and they are further to enter the marks of the theoretical papers on the slip rolls. It is alleged that at the time the petitioner's practical and oral examination was held the theoretical written papers and the roll slips containing the marks of that paper were before the examiners. After the oral and practical examination of the petitioner was over the petitioner got the impression that he had fared well in such examination but sometime l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.