SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 19

P.B.MUKHARJI
TULSIRAM SHAW – Appellant
Versus
R. C. PAL LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Ghosh, R.K.GHOSH

P. B. Mukharji

( 1 ) THIS is an action in ejectment instituted on 13th May 1948.

( 2 ) IN this suit the plaintiff is suing as the trustee of a trust estate known as debutter estate of Sri Purushottamdas Bhagwan. A vacant plot of land on the premises No. 17, Bolai Singhee Lane, Calcutta, was let out to the defendant company at a rent of Rs. 40/- per month. It is the plaintiff's case that such tenancy was terminated by notice to quit, dated 28th December 1945. The plaintiff claims possession and mesne profits.

( 3 ) THE written statement on behalf of the defendant company was filed and verified by H. C. Pal or Ramesh Chandra Pal, who has described himself as the Managing Director of the defendant company.

( 4 ) ON the pleadings, the following issues were settled: (1) Was the land vacant land? (2) Is the notice to quit valid in law? (3) To what relief, if any, is the plaintiff entitled?

( 5 ) ISSUE NO. 1: This issue is a question of fact. According to the defendant company the land that was let out was not vacant land. That is the plea in the written statement. In giving particulars in para 4 of the written statement on this point, the defendant says that there is upon the said port
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top