SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 50

BACHAWAT, K.C.DAS GUPTA
BISHNO CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
BIRENDRA KRISHNA MAZUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
LALA HEMANTA KUMAR, PRAVAS CHANDRA CHATTERJI, SAMBHUNATH BANERJEE

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) ON December 6, 1949 the landlord petitioner obtained from the Small Cause Court an order for recovery of possession of the premises from the tenant opposite party on the ground of ipso facto termination of tenancy under the Rent Control Act of 1948 in summary proceedings instituted under Chap. VII, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act. The order directed possession to be given on January 3, 1951. On 31-3-1959 the Rent Control Act of 1950 came into force. The latter Act was amended by the Amendment Act of 1950 which came into force on November 30, 1950. On January 2, 1951 the tenant applied for vacating the order for possession. On January 8, 1951. the Court directed payment of a certain sum of money and on such payment on January 19, 1951 vacated the order for possession. The landlord has moved this Court in revision against the order dated January 19, 1951.

( 2 ) IT is now settled law that the expression "decree for recovery of possession" in Section 18 (1 ). Rent Control Act of 1950 includes an order for recovery of possession under Chap. VII, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act. This was first decided in -- 'atulyadhan v. Sudhangsu, 55 Cal W. N. 343. In that case














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top