SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 48

HARRIES, BANERJEE
BIMAL SINGH KOTHARI – Appellant
Versus
MUIR MILLS CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, G.K.Mitter, S.M.BOSE

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order made by S. R. Das Gupta J. , on January 5, 1951, revoking leave granted to the plaintiffs to institute the suit under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent. That clause provides that if the cause of action shall have arisen in part within the local limits of the Ordinary Original Jurisdiction of this Court, the plaintiffs may file the suit with leave of the Court first obtained. The leave under this clause is a condition precedent to jurisdiction. Unless the condition is fulfilled by obtaining the necessary leave to sue, the Court will have no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. If the suit is instituted with the leave, and thereafter the leave is revoked, the Court will have no jurisdiction to try the suit. The revocation of leave deprives the plaintiff of his right to have his suit tried by the Court of his choice. The matter, therefore, is very serious to the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE granting and revocation of the leave is a matter in the discretion of the Court, to be exercised on well established judicial principles.

( 3 ) IN our Court, the practice is that such leave is asked for at the time, of the presentation of the plaint to the














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top