SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 99

K.C.DAS GUPTA, P.N.MUKHERJEE
AHIDHAR GHOSE – Appellant
Versus
JAGABANDHU ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anilendra Nath Roy Choudhury, BANKIM CHANDRA BANERJI, JNANENDRA NATH BAKSHI, PRASUN CHANDRA GHOSH

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is the judgment-debtor's appeal against an order of the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Alipore, rejecting his objections under section 47, Civil P. C. The material facts are not in dispute but the appellant contends that the learned Subordinate Judge has erred in law in his interpretation and application of para. 4, Indian Independence (Legal Proceedings) Order, 1947, and section 168a, Bengal Tenancy Act.

( 2 ) UNDER the zemindar-respondent the appellant holds a Patni in respect of lands which lie partly within the Indian Union and partly within Pakistan. The annual jama is Rs. 3760-11-0 and the Patni was created under a kabuliyat, executed on 20th chaitra 1319 B. section and registered on 4-4-1913. There being default in the payment of the Patni rent and the usual cesses for the period 1351 B. S. to 1354 B. S. , the landlord (respondent) instituted R. S. No. 22 of 1947 against the appellant in the 3rd Court of the Subordinate Judge at Alipore. The suit was instituted on 29-7-1947 and it ended in a compromise decree on 11-6-1948 for a sum of Rs. 16,183-12-4, payable in four annual kists or. instalments as follows:

Chaitra 1355 B. S. Rs . 41













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top