SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 96

LAHIRI, K.C.DAS GUPTA
SACHINDRA NATH – Appellant
Versus
LILABATI DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Apurba Charan Mukherjee, Hari Prasanna Mukherjee, Samarendra Nath Banerjee, SATYA PROSAD BANERJI

LAHIRI, J.

( 1 ) ON 12-4-1950, the French Court at Chandernagore passed a decree in favour of the petitioner Sachindra Nath Das against the opposite party Lilaboti Dass. This decree was notified to the opposite party presumably under Article 158, French Civil P. C. , on 3-8-1950 and the opposite party filed her opposition to the decree on 30-8-1950, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chandernagore which succeeded the French Court. This opposition was registered as Suit No. 38 of 1950 of the Court of the Subordinate Judge. Chandernagore. As the result of the trial, the learned Subordinate Judge came to the conclusion that there was no reason for setting aside the decree and dismissed the suit. Against that decree Lilaboti Das filed an appeal to the District Judge of Chandernagoro. The learned District Judge has held that Order 9, Rule 13, Indian Civil P. C. , docs not apply to the case which should be governed by Article 158. , French Civil P. C. He has accordingly allowed the appeal and remanded the suit to the trial Court for decision under Article 158, French Civil P. C. Against that decision, Sachin- dra Nath Das in whose favour the decree was passed has obtained this Rule




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top