SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 111

K.C.DAS GUPTA, LAHIRI
MIRABALA DASI – Appellant
Versus
BINAPANI DASSIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Apurbadhan Mukherjee, PRABHAS CHANDRA CHATTERJEE, SAMARENDRA N.BANERJI, SARAT CHANDRA JAIN

K.C. Das Gupta, Lahiri

( 1 ) THIS Rule was obtained by a tenant defendant against the order passed in appeal by the Chief Judge of the Small Cause Court and another Judge of the Small Cause Court, Mr. S. C. Biswas. They passed that order in appeal against the decision of the Judge Mr. P. M. Lahiri, another Judge of the Small Cause Court in an ejectment suit,. . . . . . under the West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act.

( 2 ) A preliminary point has been taken that as a second appeal lies against the decree that was passed in appeal the Court cannot interfere under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure with the order that has been passed.

( 3 ) IN our judgment this objection should succeed. The West Bengal Premises Bent Control Act has made special provision as regards the hearing of these ejectment suits and as regards appeals from decrees passed in those suits. Section 16 of the Act provides as follows:"notwithstanding anything contained in any other law a suit by a landlord against a tenant in which recovery of possession of any premises to which this Act applies is claimed shall lie to the Courts as set out in Schedule B and no other Court shall be competent to entertain or



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top