SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 109

CHAKRABARTI, G.N.DAS
DULAL CHANDRA CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
GOSTHABEHARI MITRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amarendra Narayan Bagchi, HARIDAS GUPTA, NALIN CHANDRA PAL

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal raises a short point under Section 4, Partition Act.

( 2 ) THE facts which have led up to this appeal are as follows. There is a house situated within the limits of Konnagar Municipality which was owned at one time by one Nilmoni Mitra and on his death devolved on his four sons, Tinkari, Bishnu Charan, Gangacharan and Gostha Behari. By three separate conveyances executed on three different dates in 1948 the appellant, Dulal Chandra Chatterjee, purchased the respective shares of Tinkari, Bishnu Charan and Gangacharan, and thereafter he filed a suit for partition. In that suit the remaining brother Gostha Behari, who is the respondent in this appeal, made an application under Section 4, Partition Act, praying that he might be allowed to buy the shares purchased by the plaintiff at a valuation fixed by the Court. That application was met by the appellant with the objection that the application did not lie, inasmuch as the house concerned had been let out to tenants long ago and had therefore ceased to be a 'dwelling house' within the meaning of Section 4, Partition Act. The learned Second Subordinate Judge of Hooghly declined to give effect to t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top